Free Britain

‘EURANIUM’: The Weaponized Fiat Currency

Source: Market Oracle


Like its metallic counterpart, the euro currency has the tendency to make other currencies it comes into contact with more like itself – radioactive. The inevitable result is the death of (natural) national currency systems.

The Nature of the Euro-Beast.

The euro’s architects have recognized that the worldwide dollar-reserve system cannot be sustained. The reason: The US Fed’s dual – and conflicting – mandate of price-stability and full employment. The Fed was sold to Congress via the ‘hook’ that it would allow Congress to both control inflation and maximize employment if only Congress would agree to set up this version of a central bank in the US.

As we all know, there are very few politicians who can and will resist such a temptation.

Since that proposition has predictably turned into a slow-moving disaster, the euro architects figured out that they will have to give up some of the power bestowed upon them by centralized control of interest. They did this by limiting the ECB’s function to maintaining “price stability”, i.e., limiting credit-inflation.

In so doing, they curtailed the ECB’s ability to goose the markets on demand in order paper-over occasional and inevitable economic downturns. At the same time, they took the controls off the price of gold by (a) trying to maintain roughly fifteen percent of the system’s forex reserves in the form of gold, and (b) by revaluing its gold reserves quarterly at market prices.

This is in no way a form of gold backing in the traditional sense. There is no exchangeability of euros to gold at a legislatively fixed rate, but it shows that the euro is set up to be supported by a rising price of gold, rather than being undermined by it.

There has been and continues to be much talk about the euro being designed to ultimately take over the dollar’s reserve-currency function. That is not the case, at least not completely.

If you were to ask whether the euro was in fact designed with that goal in mind, the answer would have to be a definite yes and no. “Yes” in the sense that the euro was intended to incrementally displace the dollar, and “no” in the sense that the euro would not try to assume the full burden of the dollar’s world reserve currency function.

Because of the factors mentioned earlier, the euro can’t (or rather won’t) be inflated fast enough to spread around the world and fuel global malinvestment (er, … economic growth) the way the dollar did.

Instead, the hidden idea behind the euro was to literally force the creation of other regional currencies throughout the world.

By inevitably competing with the dollar for its reserve function, the euro creators did sign the ultimate death warrant for the US dollar system. Yet, by having this “anti-inflation” bias (which is not really adverse to inflating the money supply at all, but merely tends to slow the process somewhat) any attempt to merely substitute the euro for the dollar worldwide becomes simply self-defeating..

The only solution, then, is to force the creation of other currency unions so that the euro doesn’t have to completely take over the dollar’s old function.

At least, that’s what the plan was.


2 Comments so far
Leave a comment

I found your article in a search to learn if other countries (besides USA) have a fiat currency–thanks for answering that question re: the Euro.
To note: It’s little recognized here in the States how removed the Fed is from Congressional (or popular) oversight. It’s also not widely recognized that our currency used to carry more value than ‘In G*d We Trust [that this dollar will be worth anything tomorrow]. I have asked people of the older generations about the time when our country went off the gold standard and few really remember. Coins used to be items of real value, or dollars could be exchanged for real gold/silver. Few people contemplate the implications of our currency as it is today, and how it came to be that way–in 1933, the federal government actually mandated private citizens to turn in all of their gold. In 1971, President Nixon announced the final end of the gold standard when he said that no currency could be redeemed for gold.

I’m curious about the ‘development of regional currencies’; can you please expand on that?

Comment by Mari Vega

Well regional currencies are essentially supra national, like the Euro. It just means a currency designed to be adopted by multiple sovereign countries. Well, once they started doing it they would no longer be sovereign.

Regional currencies make it easier to hide the massive redistribution of wealth and the centralisation of money-printing by the privately controlled central banks.

Comment by fmwatkins

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: