Filed under: FreeBritain, Health, Islam, News, Police State | Tags: Britain, broadcast material, Corruption, Crime, death cult, FM Watkins, FreeBritain, Freedom, Human Rights, inflammatory material, Islam, Media, Muslims, News, Politics, prophet mohammed, Religion, Telegraph, Totalitarianism
The communications watchdog, Ofcom, has made a series of rulings against channels which allowed “inflammatory” material to be broadcast in breach of rules which forbid extreme opinions gaining a platform on British television.
The cases, disclosed today, include examples of an imam telling viewers that those who disrespect the prophet Mohammed should be killed, and another broadcaster saying homosexuals should be beaten and tortured.
Please note, these statements of ‘hate’ as the establishment try to paint it, are part of Islamic teachings. It is not a ‘misunderstanding of Islam’. Another command in Islam is that anyone who leaves the knuckle dragging death cult must be murdered.
You can’t leave you see. Because Islam is so peaceful you see.
Tala Rajab, the researcher who wrote the report for Quilliam, the anti-extremist think-tank, said the fresh findings by Ofcom raised serious questions over the regulation of broadcast material.
“Some of these recent incidents have been quite shocking,” he said.
“If this had happened in a mosque the police would be right in pursuing a criminal investigation. But because they are being broadcast on television channels for some reason there seems to be little appetite for looking into these extreme messages.
“If these kind of comments were made against black people, for example, you can imagine a channel being shut down overnight, particularly if they had incited violence against a minority.”
So Ofcom, the State, the Police turn a blind eye because they’re Muslims. (Although I thought inciting the murder of people is the cardinal violation of free speech). Just like they turned a blind eye to the gang raping / drugging of white girls by Pakistani Muslims, which is okay under Islam by the way.
Islam is the most despicable ideology I’ve ever studied, and I’ve probably studied them all. But to blame Islam itself is wrong. Islam is just a collection of books and pages. MUSLIMS are the issue because they identify themselves with this creed. They are telling you ‘yes I agree with the paedophilia, the rape, murder, conquest, violence, global jihad, Jizya’ etc.
Maybe you don’t believe me. That’s okay. Here are the references.
Remember, it isn’t people like me (or you) labelling them with the same brush. They are.
Just because they’ll say other things to your face, doesn’t mean they are being honest. There is an Islamic tactic of deceit called al-Takia, which is where you lie to the worthless infidels ‘you and I’ until they get close enough to dominate, similar to lying to get into someone’s home so you can rape them.
This is Islam. There is no moderate version, extremist version, happy version, ‘misunderstanders of Islam’ version or any other apologist invention that seeks to separate the openly violent Muslims with the inwardly violent ones.
This will keep happening. I wonder how many instances of Muslims committing crimes ‘in the name of Islam’ will have to occur before these establishment morons admit there is a problem that doesn’t involve ‘stupid English racists, swivel eyed loons and so on…
Filed under: Civil Liberties, Crime, Economy, European Union, Family, FreeBritain, Health, Islam, Laws & Regulations, News, Police State, Politics, Privacy, Video | Tags: Communism, Corruption, Dictatorship, EU, EU Commission, EUCCP, Gulag, USSR, Vladimir Bukovsky
Vladimir Bukovsky spent many years in Russian labour camps and psychiatric prisons for defending human rights. He came to Britain in 1976. He lectures and writes on the old Soviet system and the EU.
Filed under: Civil Liberties, Economy, European Union, Family, FreeBritain, Health, Laws & Regulations, News, Politics | Tags: Benefit, Corruption, EU, Taxes, UKIP
The EU has voted to legalise benefit tourism, and a British MEP is behind it. The Lambert Report on the co-ordination of social security systems across the EU was voted through despite the fact that the EU has (as yet) no jurisdiction over social security.
A new EU bureaucracy will now grow up, co-ordinating social security payments among member states. People who live in one state and work in another will be able to claim benefits anywhere in the EU if they become unemployed or ill. The country in which they choose to reside must reclaim the cost of their benefits from the country where they last worked.
The author of this farce, which could bring about the collapse of our welfare state, was Jean Lambert, a British Green.
“The new legislation encourages mobility in the unemployed,” said UK Independence Party MEP Derek Clark , “but it is not an ‘on yer bike’ policy. Amendment 125 clearly states: ‘The non fulfilment by the unemployed person of all the obligations and/or job seeking activities in the member state in which he/she pursued his/her last activity shall not affect the benefits awarded in the member state of residence.
“In other words, there is no obligation to seek work. Anyone who has worked briefly in the UK , can travel to Greece or Spain, avoid doing any work, claim unemployment or disability benefits there and leave Britain to foot the bill.
“This is a licence to scrounge. You only have to return to your country of residence one day a week to qualify.”
To make matters worse, Mr. Clark added, “under a second Lambert Report, social security is extended to nationals of third countries, including stateless persons or refugees.
“The EU has just voted itself the use and abuse of British taxpayers’ money in a way that could bring our welfare state to the brink of collapse, and Jean Lambert, a British MEP, has made this possible.” Continue reading