Free Britain


True Islam broadcast on British TV

The communications watchdog, Ofcom, has made a series of rulings against channels which allowed “inflammatory” material to be broadcast in breach of rules which forbid extreme opinions gaining a platform on British television.

The cases, disclosed today, include examples of an imam telling viewers that those who disrespect the prophet Mohammed should be killed, and another broadcaster saying homosexuals should be beaten and tortured.

Please note, these statements of ‘hate’ as the establishment try to paint it, are part of Islamic teachings. It is not a ‘misunderstanding of Islam’. Another command in Islam is that anyone who leaves the knuckle dragging death cult must be murdered.

You can’t leave you see. Because Islam is so peaceful you see.

Tala Rajab, the researcher who wrote the report for Quilliam, the anti-extremist think-tank, said the fresh findings by Ofcom raised serious questions over the regulation of broadcast material.

“Some of these recent incidents have been quite shocking,” he said.

“If this had happened in a mosque the police would be right in pursuing a criminal investigation. But because they are being broadcast on television channels for some reason there seems to be little appetite for looking into these extreme messages.

“If these kind of comments were made against black people, for example, you can imagine a channel being shut down overnight, particularly if they had incited violence against a minority.”

So Ofcom, the State, the Police turn a blind eye because they’re Muslims. (Although I thought inciting the murder of people is the cardinal violation of free speech). Just like they turned a blind eye to the gang raping / drugging of white girls by Pakistani Muslims, which is okay under Islam by the way.

Islam is the most despicable  ideology I’ve ever studied, and I’ve probably studied them all. But to blame Islam itself is wrong. Islam is just a collection of books and pages. MUSLIMS are the issue because they identify themselves with this creed. They are telling you ‘yes I agree with the paedophilia, the rape, murder, conquest, violence, global jihad, Jizya’ etc.

Maybe you don’t believe me. That’s okay. Here are the references.

Remember, it isn’t people like me (or you) labelling them with the same brush. They are.

Just because they’ll say other things to your face, doesn’t mean they are being honest. There is an Islamic tactic of deceit called al-Takia, which is where you lie to the worthless infidels ‘you and I’ until they get close enough to dominate, similar to lying to get into someone’s home so you can rape them.

This is Islam. There is no moderate version, extremist version, happy version, ‘misunderstanders of Islam’ version or any other apologist invention that seeks to separate the openly violent Muslims with the inwardly violent ones.

This will keep happening. I wonder how many instances of Muslims committing crimes ‘in the name of Islam’ will have to occur before these establishment morons admit there is a problem that doesn’t involve ‘stupid English racists, swivel eyed loons and so on…

Advertisements


British MP’s cover up their corruption by simply changing the rules

Source: Daily Mail

MPs were last night accused of mounting a shameless cover-up operation to prevent voters from discovering the full truth about their lavish expenses.

This autumn, Commons authorities will for the first time release details of up to two million receipts submitted by MPs, covering claims for home improvements, furnishings and office costs.

But The Mail on Sunday can reveal that MPs have insisted on having the information censored – and in such a way that could save them from potential embarrassment.

Under the changes, the location of MPs’ taxpayer-funded second homes will be cut out while full travel details – including potentially extravagant taxi journeys – will also be exempt.

The decision to edit the claims was nodded through the Commons without a vote just before MPs broke up for the summer and came after women MPs apparently broke down in tears at the prospect of their personal details being released.

The change meant amending the Government’s flagship freedom of information legislation.

It comes ahead of an extraordinary expenses ‘big bang’ later this year, when between 1.3million and 2million receipts submitted by MPs in four-and-a-quarter years will be published on the same day.

The decision to publish the information – which could now be delayed because of the sheer bulk of work to process the receipts – has effectively been forced on a reluctant Commons Speaker Michael Martin by campaigners for open government.

However, it left many MPs nervous about what would be revealed. Continue reading



Taxpayer fury at £7million Olympics ‘junket’ for 640 public servants

This is what happens when you give a State unchecked power, when you allow the Government to continually raise taxes and create endless rules and regulations, making money off of every transaction. When you allow a Government to balloon into this vast Socialist bureaucracy with ‘civil servants’ taking advantage of the lack of oversight.

That oversight is supposed to be the People. The People are too busy watching television and complaining about the increasing cost of living, when the solution to these issues rests only with us.

Source: Daily Mail

The Government is under fire today over the number of public servants travelling to the Beijing Olympics – at a reported total cost of £7 million – amid accusations that the event is being treated as a junket.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who is flying out to attend the closing ceremony, will be accompanied by 20 aides at a cost of £114,000, it is reported.

Many bodies involved in organising the 2012 London games are sending representatives, with the capital’s Tory mayor Boris Johnson taking 13 staff at a reported cost of £167,000, while the London Development Agency has spent £3 million to hire out a private members’ club in Beijing for the duration of the Games.

Olympics Minister Tessa Jowell, Culture Secretary Andy Burnham, Sport Minister Gerry Sutcliffe and 10 officials from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport will attend the Games at a £75,000 cost.

Another 11 Whitehall ministers and officials will be going to China, the newspaper said.

In total, 639 people at a cost of £6,846,700 will attend – most of them BBC staff involved in coverage of the games. Continue reading



The European Union – the New Soviet Union?

Vladimir Bukovsky spent many years in Russian labour camps and psychiatric prisons for defending human rights. He came to Britain in 1976. He lectures and writes on the old Soviet system and the EU.



EU GIVES ITSELF More Powers Over British Taxpayers Money

Source: UKIP

The EU has voted to legalise benefit tourism, and a British MEP is behind it. The Lambert Report on the co-ordination of social security systems across the EU was voted through despite the fact that the EU has (as yet) no jurisdiction over social security.

A new EU bureaucracy will now grow up, co-ordinating social security payments among member states. People who live in one state and work in another will be able to claim benefits anywhere in the EU if they become unemployed or ill. The country in which they choose to reside must reclaim the cost of their benefits from the country where they last worked.

The author of this farce, which could bring about the collapse of our welfare state, was Jean Lambert, a British Green.

“The new legislation encourages mobility in the unemployed,” said UK Independence Party MEP Derek Clark , “but it is not an ‘on yer bike’ policy. Amendment 125 clearly states: ‘The non fulfilment by the unemployed person of all the obligations and/or job seeking activities in the member state in which he/she pursued his/her last activity shall not affect the benefits awarded in the member state of residence.

“In other words, there is no obligation to seek work. Anyone who has worked briefly in the UK , can travel to Greece or Spain, avoid doing any work, claim unemployment or disability benefits there and leave Britain to foot the bill.

“This is a licence to scrounge. You only have to return to your country of residence one day a week to qualify.”

To make matters worse, Mr. Clark added, “under a second Lambert Report, social security is extended to nationals of third countries, including stateless persons or refugees.

“The EU has just voted itself the use and abuse of British taxpayers’ money in a way that could bring our welfare state to the brink of collapse, and Jean Lambert, a British MEP, has made this possible.” Continue reading



BBC TV licence fee collectors under investigation

Good timing for this article, considering the previous one and my comments about the BBC.

Source: Daily Mail

(Extract)

The BBC is to hold an inquiry into the ‘heavy-handed’ tactics used to collect the licence fee.

Stung by accusations that bully-boy measures are often employed on innocent people, the BBC Trust will investigate whether procedures are ‘appropriate and proportionate’.

TV Licensing, the body which over-sees the collection of the fee, has been accused of a ‘Big Brother’ approach.

One recent advert – with a soundtrack of helicopter blades, barking dogs, a siren and a knock at the door – warns: ‘Your town, your street, your home. . . it is all in our database.’

The database contains 29.5million home, business and student addresses, and is supposed to show who has a licence and who does not.

It added: ‘We have begun a review to ensure the right balance is being struck between the need to raise maximum revenue and the need to avoid heavy-handedness, especially with people that do not own a television set and therefore do not need a licence.’

This always intrigued me. The mere possession of a television would empower the BBC to force you to pay them, whether you watched the BBC or not.

Charles Moore, who has been campaigning against the tactics of TV Licensing in his column in The Spectator, said he had been contacted by a Hamspshire resident who had received 78 letters from it since 2000. Continue reading



BBC fat cats get £700,000 in pay rises/ bonuses

Orwell’s Ministry of Truth padding its own pockets with your cash in praise of a propaganda job well done. Sound familiar?

Source: Daily Mail

BBC chiefs have been criticised for pocketing huge pay rises despite a disastrous year for the corporation’s reputation.

Eleven directors who oversaw phone-in scandals and job cuts shared an extra £708,000 between them – increasing the BBC pay bill by an inflation-busting 16 per cent.

But the average salary for ordinary BBC staff went up by only four per cent and is due to increase by just two per cent this year.

Gerry Morrissey, of broadcasting workers’ union Bectu, condemned the bonuses and said the board should have refused them.

‘I would remind them that 4,000 jobs have been lost since 2005,’ he said.

Mr Morrissey added that ordinary staff were working harder than ever because increased output had put a greater burden on fewer employees.

He said the disclosure of such big bonuses for board members made industrial action more likely if further job cuts were unveiled.

Well I’m sure they are doing fine, between the extortionate License Fee and kick-backs from the EU, along with the profits they receive from selling programmes and documentaries they created using License Fee payers hard earned cash (who then have to pay again to get a copy.) No problem, they need to keep their propaganda machinery well oiled, just like the Socialist Police State. Personally, I have never paid the License Fee, even back in the way when I used to watch television. You should not pay it either, for many reasons, like this, this, this and this.