Free Britain

Come to Britain and get YOUR benefits!!!

Is the name of a leaflet published by the Department for Work and Pensions. You can download it and read it here > Coming From Abroad and Claiming Your Benefits.

This is tailored specifically to immigrants. Page 4 states that the leaflet applies to ‘every country in the world’. The final page lets you know that it is available in languages like Arabic, Somali and Bengali.

Today I see an article on the Daily Mail site entitled: More than a million immigrants live in homes paid for by the taxpayer.

In the comments I’m reading about taxpayers that are denied affordable housing because the waiting lists are ‘at least 10 years’ while immigrants are pushed to the front of the queue. Another comment alludes to the fact that those figures don’t account for other types of accomodation paid through other benefits.

Which country is the Equality Commission operating in? No sign of bias in housing towards immigrants? That very issue was highlighted on Channel 4 on Monday evening.

In Bristol, which has a big social housing shortage, Channel 4 reported that 10,000 Somalis had been sent to be housed here by central government. In the last three years. Are they living on the streets? No! They were all found subsidised housing and were automatically housed by being placed at the top of a special A list of priority applicants.

Some residents in Bristol have been waiting 20 years, like my brother, but they are on the councils C list i.e. they are not prioritised. He has worked and paid taxes for 30 years in this country and had to watch as Somali families arrived in Bristol and immediately occupied pre-arranged council housing.

What say you Equality Commission?

Immigrants should not be entitled to anything from a host country without a long list of eligibility criteria, such as living here for at least 10 years, having a British grandparent, things like that.

Taxpayers are experiencing Redistribution of Wealth on a massive scale. Young British people are finding themselves with nowhere they can afford, as private rents are huge and affordable housing is taken up by immigrants and their ‘rights’ which seem to trump the rights of the taxpayer.

The criminal government recently stated that ‘immgrants are not given preferential treatment with housing’. I find that hard to believe considering millions of immigrants are, at this very second, living in such housing.

The immigration boom did not happen by accident. It was not, as my colleague Simon Heffer pointed out on Wednesday, the result of incompetence. There has been a deliberate and coldly calculated effort to transform Britain into a Labour-voting multi-cultural melting pot.

At the same time as our council housing has been handed over to immigrants over one million voters from abroad have been added to the electoral register in only two years following the introduction of the Electoral Administration Act.

New applicants do not have to provide documents proving their identity or even whether they are in the country legally. Instead, they simply fill in a two-page form and declare that the details are correct.

Britain’s sovereignty, its citizens and their rights are being systematically destroyed by a government whose allegience is their Marxist ideology and the globalist EU. How far does this have to go before people do something about it?


Revealed: How immigration actually costs Britain money and could cause huge social problems

Source: Daily Mail


If there were to be a British Statue of Liberty, it should be erected at Victoria coach station in London.

For it is here that most of the tired, poor, huddled masses of Eastern Europeans have arrived seeking what Michael Howard once called the ‘British dream’.

The influx of the past ten years has been the largest in Britain’s history, changing the country for ever.

Immigrants now make up a ninth of our population, produce a fifth of our babies and fill (or create) most of our new jobs.

It’s a situation that causes concern across the board. Recently an all-party group of MPs and peers, including Frank Field, made a desperate plea for ‘balanced migration’ — meaning that immigration should be linked to the number of people leaving the country.

They also suggested an annual limit of up to 20,000 non-EU immigrants and published the results of a YouGov poll which suggests that limiting immigration would be a vote-winner for any party.

If all this immigration were the product of deliberate policy, one might indeed expect a British Statue of Liberty to be in the planning stages, as a way of commemorating how Britain, in just a few years, became almost as much of an immigrant country as the vast continent that is the United States (an eighth of its population is immigrant).

Yet the truth is that this social transformation pretty much happened by accident. Not so much a ‘British dream’, as what happened when ministers were asleep.

Nonsense. This was planned, from the Marxists in Parliament to those they illegally sold our soverignty to, the unelected EU. This was always about destroying Britain. Globalisation and pulling down everybody below the political and corporate elite. Continue reading

British Government Works To Disenfranchise White Males

Source: BBC

FM Watkins

I touched upon this scheme from this liberal Marxo-feminist in another post, It should not be illegal to discriminate against white men. Today on the BBC website is another article about her continued push for this most disgusting proposal.

There is no such thing as positive discrimination. It is all discrimination. This is straight out of Communism, the States’ desire to ‘equalise’ the groups in employment. White men in Britain must be completely undermined in order to be able to complete the State’s takeover of the country (totalitarianism.) Notice how there are no similar campaigns to discriminate against other groups in any case of white men being the minority. By the way, society is not composed of groups, it is composed of individuals. Using groups is the Collectivist method to ‘divide and conquer’.

Harriet Harman has defended plans to make it legal for firms to discriminate in favour of female and ethnic minorities job candidates.

The equalities minister said firms should be able to choose a woman over a man of equal ability if they want to.

‘In favour of female and ethnic minorities’ means anyone but white men, seeing as that is the only demographic not covered by Harriet Harridan’s feminist policy. There are more women of working age in Britain than men. So technically men are the minority, not that it matters. Who does the State see as the threat eh?

The new Equalities Bill will also force employers to disclose salary structures in a bid to close the gender pay gap.

The plans, which will be adopted first across England then Wales and Scotland, will also ban all age discrimination.

We all know about the Gender Pay GapTM LIE. It does however offer a suitable Dialectic for the State to continue to expand its powers into the lives of private businesses, along with providing lots of work for employment lawyers and making it even harder for smaller businesses to exist. Continue reading

EU Constitution author says referendums can be ignored

Underneath all of the rhetoric spilling forth from Brussels regarding its respect for democracy and the desires of the People is the underlying attitude of total disregard for due process and the existence of a Dictatorship under the guise of ‘Union’. Talk of ‘ignoring the vote’ and ‘pushing ahead with ideas for supranational government’ is met with pathetic indifference, or at the most, a passing comment squeezed in between articles about celebrities and fashion shows. Do people not care if they are enslaved in a Communist Regime? This subject is about the very essence of freedom, sovereignty and democracy. Nothing is more important!

Source: Telegraph

Future referendums will be ignored whether they are held in Ireland or elsewhere, Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, the architect of the European Union Constitution said.

The former President of France drafted the old Constitution that was rejected by French and Dutch voters three years ago before being resurrected as the Lisbon EU Treaty, itself shunned by the Irish two weeks ago.

Mr Giscard d’Estaing told the Irish Times that Ireland’s referendum rejection would not kill the Treaty, despite a legal requirement of unanimity from all the EU’s 27 member states.

“We are evolving towards majority voting because if we stay with unanimity, we will do nothing,” he said.

“It is impossible to function by unanimity with 27 members. This time it’s Ireland; the next time it will be somebody else.”

“Ireland is one per cent of the EU”.

Mr Giscard d’Estaing also admitted that, unlike his original Constitutional Treaty, the Lisbon EU Treaty had been carefully crafted to confuse the public.

“What was done in the [Lisbon] Treaty, and deliberately, was to mix everything up. If you look for the passages on institutions, they’re in different places, on different pages,” he said.

“Someone who wanted to understand how the thing worked could with the Constitutional Treaty, but not with this one.” Continue reading

The Truth About CCTV

FM Watkins

There is something of a continual debate here in the UK regarding CCTV. On one side are those who see the technology as a benefit, to catching criminals etc, they usually have had something happen to them, or know someone who has so it is a lot more personal. Otherwise they just use the ‘well if you have nothing to hide…’ argument.

From The Guardian:

Your private life on show to civil servants? More bureaucrats, local and national, having access to your personal information – through data-sharing and data-matching between government databases, through access to your telephone and email data, through the national database that will lie behind a “smart” identity card. Your health records on tap to researchers by ministerial order – your doctor can’t say no. Local authorities, even health trusts, able to put you under covert surveillance.

I am firmly in the ‘NO CCTV’ camp. The idea that the ever-growing parasitic corporate government and its equally corrupt subsidiaries have eyes (and now ears and mouths) watching almost every square metre of Britain does not encourage the concept of a free people. Most people who bleat on about CCTV have little or no idea about how prevalent it is, who has access to it and the potential for function creep.

I am going to address some of these issues now. Continue reading