Free Britain

The organisation seeking to totally control the planet’s food supply

Some clips from the article, I strongly advise it is read fully.

Source: Healthmoneyvine

The Codeath, sorry, Codex Alimentarius Commission is a very misunderstood organisation. Most people have never heard of it, and those who have heard of it may not understand the true reality of this extremely powerful trade organisation. According to the official Codex Alimentarius website[click on the link below], the altruistic purpose of this commission is in “protecting health of the consumers and ensuring fair trade practices in the food trade, and promoting coordination of all food standards work undertaken by international governmental and non-governmental organizations”. The Codex Alimentarius (Latin for “Food Code”) is regulated under a joint venture between the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO).
Codex Alimentarius Website


Since 2002, the Codex Alimentarius Commission has covertly surrendered its role as an international public health and consumer protection organisation. Under the helm of big industry, the surreptitious purpose of the new Codex is to increase profits for the global corporate juggernauts while controlling the world through food.


Some Codex standards which are proposed to take effect in the near future, and which will be completely irrevocable once initiated, include: (5)

  • All nutrients (e.g., vitamins and minerals) are to be considered toxins/poisons and are to be removed from all food because Codex prohibits the use of nutrients to “prevent, treat or cure any condition or disease”.
  • All food (including organic) is to be irradiated, thus removing all “toxic” nutrients from food (unless consumers can source their food locally). The precursor to Codex harmonisation in this area began in the USA in August 2008 with the clandestine decision to mandate the mass irradiation of all lettuce and spinach in the name of public health and safety. If the safety of the public was the main concern of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), then why were people not alerted to this new practice?
  • Nutrients allowed will be limited to a Positive List developed by Codex; it will include such “beneficial” nutrients as fluoride (3.8 mg daily), sourced from industrial waste.
  • All nutrients (e.g., vitamins A, B, C, D, zinc and magnesium) that have any positive health impact on the body will be deemed illegal in therapeutic doses under Codex and are to be reduced to amounts negligible to health, with maximum limits set at 15 per cent of the current Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA)(6) You will not be able to obtain these nutrients in therapeutic doses anywhere in the world, even with a prescription. Potentially permissible safe levels of nutrients under the Codex are not yet set in stone. Some probable examples based on the European Union (EU) system may include:

– Niacin: upper limit of 34 ìg (micrograms) daily (effective daily doses range from 2,000 to 3,000 ìg).

– Vitamin C: upper limits of 65 to 225 ìg daily (effective daily doses range from 6,000 to 10,000 ìg).

– Vitamin D: upper limit of 5 ìg daily (effective daily doses range from 6,000 to 10,000 ìg).

– Vitamin E: upper limit of 15 IU (international units) of alpha tocopherol per day, even though alpha tocopherol by itself has been implicated in cell damage and is toxic to the body (effective daily doses of mixed tocopherols range from 10,000 to12,000 IU).

  • It will most likely be illegal to give any advice on nutrition (including in written articles posted online and in journals as well as oral advice to a friend, a family member or anyone). This directive applies to any and all reports on vitamins and minerals and all nutritionists’ consultations. This type of information may be considered a hidden barrier to trade and may result in economic trade sanctions for the involved country.
  • All dairy cows on the planet are to be treated with Monsanto’s genetically engineered recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH).
  • All animals used for food are to be treated with potent antibiotics and exogenous growth hormones.
  • Deadly and carcinogenic organic pesticides, including seven of the 12 worst (e.g., hexachlorobenzene, toxaphene and aldrin), which were banned by 176 countries (including the US) in 1991 at the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants,(7) will be allowed back into food at elevated levels.
  • The Codex will allow dangerous and toxic levels of aflatoxin (0.5 ppb) in milk. Aflatoxin, produced in animal feed that’s gone mouldy in storage, is the second-most potent (non-radiation-related) carcinogenic compound known.
  • Use of growth hormones and antibiotics will be mandatory on all livestock, birds and aquacultured species meant for human consumption.
  • The worldwide introduction of unlabelled and deadly GMOs into crops, animals, fish and plants will be mandated.
  • Elevated levels of residue from pesticides and insecticides that are toxic to humans and animals will be allowed.


Population control for money is the easiest way to describe the new Codex Alimentarius, which in effect is being run by the US and primarily controlled by Big Pharma with the aim of reducing the world’s population from its current estimate of 6.692 billion to a sustainable 500 million—an approximate 93 per cent reduction. Interestingly enough, before the arrival of Europeans in America, the Native American population in the US was around 60 million. (13) today it hovers around 500,000, or an approximate 92 per cent reduction as a result of government policies of genocide, starvation and poisoning. Codex is similar to other population control measures undertaken clandestinely by governments of the western world; for example, the introduction of DNA-damaging and latent immunosuppressive agents in vaccines (e.g.,weaponised avian flu and AIDS), aspartame, chemtrails, chemotherapy for cancer treatment and RU486 (the abortion pill funded by the Rockefeller dynasty).

FAO and WHO have estimated that by the introduction of just the vitamin and mineral guideline alone, within 10 years a minimum three billion deaths will result. (14)

One billion of these deaths will be due to starvation, and two billion as a result of preventable and degenerative diseases of under-nutrition, e.g., cancer, cardiovascular disease and diabetes. (15) (16)

Read the full article here

80 million Britons, and no one you can trust

Source: Daily Mail

Our Brussels masters predict that Britain will soon be the most crowded country in the whole of Europe. Presumably this is what they want, since it is their laws that have destroyed our borders and abolished British citizenship and British passports (that wretched puce thing in your pocket is an EU passport, not a British one, and the further east you go, the easier they are to get).

The European Commission says there will be almost 80million people crammed into our landscape by 2058. Just imagine all that concrete, the thousands of square miles (or square kilometres as they will be by then) chewed up by bulldozers.

Imagine the unending 24-hour whoosh and grind of traffic, the bulging trains, the seething, noisy, litter-strewn parks on hot summer Sundays, the crowded schools, the endless waits at enormous polyclinics to see a doctor you’ve never met before and will never see again, who probably doesn’t have English as a first language, and the multicultural schools where half the class will always be from somewhere else. I’m quite glad to think I’ll be dead by then.

I’ve always been unmoved by arguments that immigration benefits’ the country economically. Maybe it does, if you eat at restaurants rather than working in them, and then hurry away to expensive areas where no immigrants live. But for most people it’s an unmixed curse.

For the migrants themselves it is often a journey into exploitation and squalor, miserable pay and ten-to-a-room living conditions. It holds down wages and puts unwanted pressure on services, transport and housing which are already under strain.

But there’s something else about it that is profoundly, heartbreakingly sad. When so many of our fellow creatures don’t speak our language, don’t understand our laws and customs, don’t know our history, can’t read our facial expressions or work out when we’re joking, we live at a lower level than we did before. Continue reading

Health Canada: Protect children’s teeth by lowering fluoride ingestion

Yes, fluoridated water is bad for you. It does have the convenient effect of increasing apathy and narcotising your brain, which makes you more subservient to authority. No wonder our commie-rulers insist on it.

Source: Natural News


Canadian children are ingesting too much cavity-fighting fluoride and it can ruin their teeth. U.S. children ingest even more fluoride but no such sound advice is evident from U.S. officials. To avoid fluoride-induced yellow and tan discolored teeth (moderate dental fluorosis), fluoride chemicals injected into Canadian water supplies should be lowered, says an expert panel, including two Americans, convened by Health Canada. Less fluoride in children’s toothpaste and infant formula is also recommended.

Because scientific evidence shows that even low amounts of ingested fluoride poses dental and health risks, many environmental groups, eleven U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Unions and over 1,780 professionals urge that fluoridation be stopped worldwide ((…) .

“The best way to lower children’s fluoride intake, as Health Canada suggests, is to stop fluoridation,” says Paul Connett, PhD, Executive Director, Fluoride Action Network (FAN). “It makes no sense to prescribe fluoride drugs to children via the water supply at levels which are between 150 and 250 times higher than the level in mothers’ milk,” says Connett. Continue reading

English is a second language for 1 in 8 pupils in England

Source: Daily Mail


One in eight pupils speaks English as a second language, a report has revealed.

The Government survey highlights the ‘disunited nations’ in classrooms as teachers battle to educate a massive influx of immigrants. In some areas more than 70 per cent of pupils arriving at the school gates do not speak English as their mother tongue.

MPs and unions immediately called on ministers to take urgent action to prevent primaries and secondaries being overwhelmed by the pressure. They warn that schools are being forced to juggle resources as migrant children take longer to understand lessons and divert the teacher’s energies from other pupils.

The figures give the sharpest snapshot yet of the scale of the challenge facing schools around the country.

The Department for Children, Schools and Families statistics showed that 815,450 schoolchildren  –  or 12.5 per cent  –  did not speak English as their mother tongue as of January this year.

For primary schools, the proportion was 14.3 per cent, or one in seven, compared with 10.5 per cent in 2004, the year before European Union expansion.

Meanwhile, in secondary schools 10.6 per cent of pupils, or about 450,000, have English as a second language. Two years ago, the proportion was 9.5 per cent. Continue reading

Royal Mail stops village’s post deliveries because its roads are ‘too steep’

Rubbish, another Directive from the EU, the Health and Safety excuse and general warfare against rural Britain. The purpose of this is to drive everyone into the cities, where they can be easily tracked and traced, taxed and enslaved.

Source: Daily Mail

With its twisting country lanes and weathered stone cottages, it could be a scene from a real-life episode of Postman Pat.

But deliveries of mail have become a thing of the past in a tiny hamlet in the Yorkshire Dales because the road up to it is too steep for postal vans.

Residents of Booze – which despite its name has no pub, or indeed any other amenities – said the decision, taken in the name of health and safety, had cut off a vital lifeline.

Throughout living memory, postmen have scrambled or driven up the slopes of Arkengarthdale to deliver to the scattering of houses and farms that make up the historic former lead mining community in all weathers.

But now Royal Mail bosses have written to all 11 households telling them the only road that links Booze with the outside world is too narrow for its vans to negotiate safely.

Carrying the mail up on foot is also out of the question because the postman has a ‘bad back’, residents have been told.

Unless they can make alternative arrangements, they face having to collect their post from the sorting office in Richmond – a 45-minute drive away.

The threat of losing postal deliveries is just the latest blow facing Britain’s isolated rural communities, already suffering from soaring fuel prices and the closure of shops and post offices. Continue reading

The Truth about Islam’s Prophet

Source: Religion of Peace

As a Muslim, you know that life is full of tough choices. Do you behead or not behead? Have adult relations with your buddy’s 9-year-old child…? Take a female sex slave… ?

For followers of the Religion of Peace, it all comes down to knowing what Muhammad did when faced with the same decisions (based on reliable Muslim sources, of course). In fact, the more you know about the founder of Islam the better, even if you aren’t Muslim.

Forget all those shifty-eyed apologists, trying to make Muhammad out to be some sort of “Jesus clone” based on a few obscure anecdotes. The prophet of Islam definitely wasn’t one to turn the other cheek or keep his worldly appetites in check.

You want the truth? Think you can handle it? Well, here you are then…

While reading through these points, keep in mind that all Muslims must work to live their lives as close to the image of Muhammad as possible. Indeed, being the Prophet, his actions are the epitome of Islamic values and culture, so if you see or hear of similar behaviour from other Muslims, remember that it is not an exception, but rather, the rule. If a Muslim tells you otherwise, they are simply practising Al-Takeyya, the meaning of which can be found after the jump;

Click here to see what Muhammed would do…

Source: Islam Review

The principle of Al-Takeyya Continue reading

Innocents’ DNA ‘should be erased’

Source: BBC


DNA profiles of innocent people should be removed from the national database, a government-funded inquiry has said.

Control of the database should be taken from government and police and an independent body should be established to run it, the Citizens’ Inquiry urged.

Javed Aslam, one of the 30 members of the public on the panel, said keeping the records would be “the first step towards a totalitarian state”.

But the Home Office said the database helps to secure convictions.

The UK has the largest police DNA database in the world – with more than four million people on file.

Among the study’s conclusions was that guilty people who have served their time should eventually have their DNA records erased because retaining the profile “continues to criminalise them”.

This is despite the fact that DNA records have been used to solve a number of “cold case” inquires in recent years.

The inquiry was conducted by 30 members of the public in two linked panels in Birmingham and Glasgow. It was funded by £50,000 of taxpayers’ money.

Prof Albert Weale, chairman of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, responded to the report findings, saying: “We agree that the DNA of innocent people should not be kept by police. Continue reading