Free Britain


EU Dictatorship Vs Ireland: Round 2

Daily Mail

Europe’s leaders are poised today to endorse a series of ‘bribes’ designed to persuade Irish voters to reverse their rejection of the EU constitution.

They will be encouraged to back the document in a second vote next year.

EU chiefs last night agreed in principle key concessions to Dublin at a Brussels summit in return for a re-run of the referendum. They are expected to sign the deal today and hope the Irish will deliver the ‘right’ result when they vote again.

It means the re-jigged blueprint for a ‘United States of Europe’ – now renamed the Lisbon Treaty – could be in force by the beginning of 2010, despite being rejected by voters three times.

And Britain will be fully signed up to it without the referendum Labour promised.

According to draft conclusions for the two-day meeting leaked last night, Dublin ‘is committed to seeking ratification’ of the treaty by the end of October 2009.

The move was seized on by the Tories who upped the pressure on Gordon Brown for reneging on a 2005 General Election manifesto pledge when the constitution was re-drawn as a treaty.

Yeah, and what happened? He said one thing, sorry, he PROMISED one thing, and did the opposite and no one tears down Westminster.

One EU diplomat close to the talks added last night: ‘There’s a wide agreement on Lisbon, but we’ll need to come back on some details tomorrow.’

Ireland’s Prime Minister Brian Cowen is expected today to confirm that another referendum on the treaty will be held. He will claim that securing deals on retaining Ireland’s EU commissioner, its military neutrality, abortion, workers’ rights and taxation laws means a second vote is necessary.

Well, maybe. Until the unelected heads of the EU decide to change the Lisbon Treaty at will, without a vote by anyone anywhere. It is called Article 48. These so called ‘concessions’ are just cheap parlour tricks.

Irish foreign minister Micheal Martin said the concession on a commissioner was a fundamental reform. Under the original treaty terms, the number of commissioners was set to fall to 18 and appointed on a rotation basis, meaning some countries would be left unrepresented.

Why do you think they are moving to majority voting? Mob rules, my friends. The EU knows that the largest countries are all fabian socialist shitholes dedicated to the Communist Utopia. As Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, the architect of the European Union Constitution states:

“We are evolving towards majority voting because if we stay with unanimity, we will do nothing,” he said.

“It is impossible to function by unanimity with 27 members. This time it’s Ireland; the next time it will be somebody else.”

“Ireland is one per cent of the EU”.

Indeed. So your wonderful ‘EU Commissioner’ will be out-voted on anything the EU doesn’t agree with anyway. Democracy, EU style.

Declan Ganley, the chairman of Libertas, which led the triumphant ‘No’ campaign in the first Irish referendum, said the summit deal was an example of the Irish being dictated to by Brussels.

‘The powerful elite in Brussels is utter contempt for the democratic decision of the Irish people in rejecting the Lisbon Treaty, he said.

‘It’s time to put a stop to this bullying.’

In Britain, Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague attacked Mr Brown for his part in pressuring Dublin to vote again.

He said: ‘Trying to force the Lisbon Treaty down the Irish people’s throats again is not only a dangerous distraction from that agenda, it is profoundly undemocratic.’

He added: ‘If our unelected Prime Minister insists on forcing the Irish people to vote twice, the case for letting the British people vote once will be morally unanswerable.’

The ‘new’ treaty, signed in Lisbon in December 2007, was drawn up to replace the EU constitution, thrown out by voters in France and the Netherlands in 2005.

Critics say that the two documents are virtually identical with crucial powers handed over from member states to Brussels.

Not just critics, most of the EU elitists as well, including the man who crafted the original EU Constitution. Here are two quotes:

The European Commission
“It’s essentially the same proposal as the old Constitution.”
(Margot Wallstrom, EU Commissioner, Svenska Dagbladet, 26 June 2007)

Germany
“The substance of the Constitution is preserved. That is a fact.”
(Angela Merkel, German Chancellor, Telegraph, 29 June 2007)

The EU insists that it is needed to help ease decision-making within the expanding bloc.

Ease decision making for the dictators in the EU that is. What else could it possibly mean? The Treaty is about the centralisation of power, away from you and your country. Away from everyone and their countries. Don’t believe me? Read the damn thing.

Open Europe director Lorraine Mullally said: ‘This whole process is nothing but a charade to make it look as though people’s concerns about the treaty have been addressed. The Irish ‘No’ vote is being ignored in a most dishonest way.’

From IRELAND SAYS NO TO LISBON TREATY!!

People have to realise that their respective governments do not act in their best interests or in the interests of their Laws. This has been decades in the planning and implementing and we are now in the final stages of their endgame for the European Superstate;

Former Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovksy, who personally saw secret documents in 1992 which outlined a conspiracy to turn the European Union into a Socialist dictatorship;

The Soviet files outlined a plan from the mid-1980’s onwards to hijack the European Union and turn it into what Bukovksy calls the EUSSR, a totalitarian federal superstate with no accountability or direct representation.

Some more information regarding the EU, and the Lisbon Treaty:

Why Ireland should vote No to the Lisbon Treaty

EU Constitution author says referendums can be ignored

The European Union Story

EU Map deletes England, replaces it with Regions

Ever-closer European Union underway

IRELAND SAYS NO TO LISBON TREATY!!

Anger at plans for EU wide police force with powers to snoop on Britons

FreeBritain: Lisbon Treaty

FreeBritain: European Union

Get informed! Spread the information. You can’t make an educated vote if you do not know the facts. That’s what the EU is counting on.

Advertisements


Treat Islam with more respect than Christianity: BBC

Source: Daily Mail

(Extract)

BBC director general Mark Thompson has admitted that the broadcaster has to tackle Islam differently to Christianity and is reluctant to broadcast jokes about it.

He suggested that coverage needed to consider the feelings of Muslims because they are a religious minority, and had not fully integrated in to British society.

Mr Thompson was responding to comments made by comedian Ben Elton earlier this year who accused the BBC of being too scared to joke about Islam.

He said the corporation was too concerned with political correctness to poke fun at imams but were happy to satirise vicars.

Speaking at an annual theology lecture for religious think tank Theos, Mr Thompson said: ‘My view is that there is a difference between the position of Christianity, which I believe should be central to the BBC’s religion coverage and widely respected and followed.

‘What Christian identity feels like to the broad population is a little bit different to people for whom their religion is also associated with an ethnic identity which has not been fully integrated.

‘There’s no reason why any religion should be immune from discussion, but I don’t want to say that all religions are the same. To be a minority I think puts a slightly different outlook on it.’ Continue reading



Come to Britain and get YOUR benefits!!!

Is the name of a leaflet published by the Department for Work and Pensions. You can download it and read it here > Coming From Abroad and Claiming Your Benefits.

This is tailored specifically to immigrants. Page 4 states that the leaflet applies to ‘every country in the world’. The final page lets you know that it is available in languages like Arabic, Somali and Bengali.

Today I see an article on the Daily Mail site entitled: More than a million immigrants live in homes paid for by the taxpayer.

In the comments I’m reading about taxpayers that are denied affordable housing because the waiting lists are ‘at least 10 years’ while immigrants are pushed to the front of the queue. Another comment alludes to the fact that those figures don’t account for other types of accomodation paid through other benefits.

Which country is the Equality Commission operating in? No sign of bias in housing towards immigrants? That very issue was highlighted on Channel 4 on Monday evening.

In Bristol, which has a big social housing shortage, Channel 4 reported that 10,000 Somalis had been sent to be housed here by central government. In the last three years. Are they living on the streets? No! They were all found subsidised housing and were automatically housed by being placed at the top of a special A list of priority applicants.

Some residents in Bristol have been waiting 20 years, like my brother, but they are on the councils C list i.e. they are not prioritised. He has worked and paid taxes for 30 years in this country and had to watch as Somali families arrived in Bristol and immediately occupied pre-arranged council housing.

What say you Equality Commission?

Immigrants should not be entitled to anything from a host country without a long list of eligibility criteria, such as living here for at least 10 years, having a British grandparent, things like that.

Taxpayers are experiencing Redistribution of Wealth on a massive scale. Young British people are finding themselves with nowhere they can afford, as private rents are huge and affordable housing is taken up by immigrants and their ‘rights’ which seem to trump the rights of the taxpayer.

The criminal government recently stated that ‘immgrants are not given preferential treatment with housing’. I find that hard to believe considering millions of immigrants are, at this very second, living in such housing.

The immigration boom did not happen by accident. It was not, as my colleague Simon Heffer pointed out on Wednesday, the result of incompetence. There has been a deliberate and coldly calculated effort to transform Britain into a Labour-voting multi-cultural melting pot.

At the same time as our council housing has been handed over to immigrants over one million voters from abroad have been added to the electoral register in only two years following the introduction of the Electoral Administration Act.

New applicants do not have to provide documents proving their identity or even whether they are in the country legally. Instead, they simply fill in a two-page form and declare that the details are correct.

Britain’s sovereignty, its citizens and their rights are being systematically destroyed by a government whose allegience is their Marxist ideology and the globalist EU. How far does this have to go before people do something about it?



MPs too scared to talk about forced marriage ‘in case they lose Muslim votes’

Who is your daddy. Pathetic behaviour of politicians, scrambling for votes. All that interests these traitors is being re-elected.

Source: Telegraph

(Extract)

Ann Cryer said politicians in areas with high Muslim populations, many of which are Labour heartlands, should be at the forefront of the campaign to stop young couples being made to wed against their will by their families.

But she claimed that some politicians are afraid to speak out on the issue in case they alienate Muslim voters. The forced marriage unit at the Foreign Office deals with an estimated 300 cases every year, most of them involving teenage girls from Pakistani or Bangladeshi families.

Mrs Cryer, who is stepping down as MP for Keighley in West Yorkshire at the next general election, added that local Muslim leaders are not doing enough to encourage integration and accused them of trying to keep immigrants who move to Britain “in the backwoods”.

It comes just days after Gordon Brown praised her “brave” campaign against forced marriage, and said her understanding of her constituency was “second to none”.

Mrs Cryer, 68, said: “There still is a nervousness to talk about this, especially those MPs in constituencies affected by these issues.

“They should be fighting on the front line, but they are the ones keeping quiet on the issue because they don’t want to lose votes.



Babies to be assessed on their ‘crying, babbling and squealing’ by fascist government

As per the course with socialist statist tyrants. What next, children facing criminal checks from the cradle?

Source: Daily Mail

A curriculum for nursery education which will see babies assessed on their ‘crying, babbling and squealing’ was condemned by parents’ groups.

The Early Years Foundation Stage – dubbed the ‘nappy curriculum’ – is compulsory for all nurseries, childminders and playgroups in England from this week.

Ministers say the guidelines for children from birth to five years old will improve standards in nursery education.

But campaigners oppose the rules that will measure toddlers’ progress against 69 ‘early learning goals.’

Opposition to Marxists is irrelevant to them. These traitors already believe they have superiority over the People and view your opposition as a sign of ignorance of their ‘illuminated’ view of how society should be. A communist utopia where you are a slave and the State is your Master.

It will also see carers monitor the way babies up to 11 months old communicate.

Margaret Morrissey from the National Confederation of Parent Teacher Associations said: ‘It is absolutely unbelievable that they can bring in this curriculum for such tiny children.

‘Under fives develop at an incredibly different pace. All this is going to do is put extreme pressure on the people who look after children.

‘It is going to put a whole category of children into failing before they even enter a school.’

Children’s Secretary Ed Balls said the rules will reduce inequality by ensuring the education of toddlers from disadvantaged families.

I f*cking hate this government. They need to be replaced, with force if necessary before they reduce Britain to a third world police state ghetto



Nursery booklet for parents is ‘blatant propaganda’

Source: Times Online

(Extract)

Ministers are producing misleading “propaganda” which skirts around new targets for the under-5s in an attempt to head off a revolt by parents of nursery children, campaigners claim today.

Under the new Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) framework which comes into force next week, all preschool children in private, voluntary or state childcare in England will be expected to meet 69 literacy, numeracy and problem-solving targets based on, and even using, computers and other technology.

But a booklet for parents on the framework contains no mention of any of the statutory literacy or numeracy targets, emphasising only that children will be expected to “learn through play” and “develop at their own pace”.

Two of the most contentious targets are that children should “write their own names . . . and begin to form simple sentences, sometimes using punctuation” and “use phonic knowledge to write simple regular words and make phonetically plausible attempts at more complex words”.

This is despite the guidance for nurseries and childcarers referring to the targets as “learning and development requirements that all early years providers must by law deliver”. Continue reading



The Stasi is formed in Britain, August 27th 2008

Source: Daily Mail

(Extract)

Security guards and town hall workers are being armed with sweeping police-style powers, it has emerged.

For a few hundred pounds, state and private sector employees can receive Home Office accreditation.

This allows them to hand out fines for a raft of offences, from dropping litter to riding a bike on the pavement.

They can also stop cars to check their tax discs, seize alcohol from underage drinkers and demand people’s names and addresses.

The hope is that they will free up rank-and-file officers from having to perform these unpopular tasks. The uniformed, badged army of snoopers will become a vital part of the ‘extended police family’, ministers say.

But privacy campaigners have dubbed them Home Secretary Jacqui Smith’s ‘Stasi’ after the East German secret police.

Phil Booth of NO2ID said: ‘This is a sinister move towards a Stasi snooper state in which jobsworths are devolved the powers of the police – including the right to demand you identify yourself.’

Shadow Home Secretary Dominic Grieve added: ‘This is a consequence of the Government’s obsession with policing on the cheap as well as their staggering complacency towards the extension of surveillance by an increasing amount of different bodies.

‘The public will be angered that the Home Office is seeking to take serious powers that should be appropriately applied by the police and encouraging them to be given not just to local councils, but also to private firms.

‘The public want to see real police on the streets discharging these responsibilities, not private firms who may use them inappropriately – including unnecessarily snooping on the lives of ordinary citizens.’

Details of the new army of police-style officers emerged in Home Office papers released today.

There are already 1,400 town hall and private sector staff accredited, and ministers want a dramatic expansion of the scheme.

Called the Community Safety Accreditation Scheme, it allows the likes of security guards, park wardens, car park attendants and store detectives to boost their roles if they undergo training and pay a small fee to their local police force. Continue reading