Free Britain


True Islam broadcast on British TV

The communications watchdog, Ofcom, has made a series of rulings against channels which allowed “inflammatory” material to be broadcast in breach of rules which forbid extreme opinions gaining a platform on British television.

The cases, disclosed today, include examples of an imam telling viewers that those who disrespect the prophet Mohammed should be killed, and another broadcaster saying homosexuals should be beaten and tortured.

Please note, these statements of ‘hate’ as the establishment try to paint it, are part of Islamic teachings. It is not a ‘misunderstanding of Islam’. Another command in Islam is that anyone who leaves the knuckle dragging death cult must be murdered.

You can’t leave you see. Because Islam is so peaceful you see.

Tala Rajab, the researcher who wrote the report for Quilliam, the anti-extremist think-tank, said the fresh findings by Ofcom raised serious questions over the regulation of broadcast material.

“Some of these recent incidents have been quite shocking,” he said.

“If this had happened in a mosque the police would be right in pursuing a criminal investigation. But because they are being broadcast on television channels for some reason there seems to be little appetite for looking into these extreme messages.

“If these kind of comments were made against black people, for example, you can imagine a channel being shut down overnight, particularly if they had incited violence against a minority.”

So Ofcom, the State, the Police turn a blind eye because they’re Muslims. (Although I thought inciting the murder of people is the cardinal violation of free speech). Just like they turned a blind eye to the gang raping / drugging of white girls by Pakistani Muslims, which is okay under Islam by the way.

Islam is the most despicable  ideology I’ve ever studied, and I’ve probably studied them all. But to blame Islam itself is wrong. Islam is just a collection of books and pages. MUSLIMS are the issue because they identify themselves with this creed. They are telling you ‘yes I agree with the paedophilia, the rape, murder, conquest, violence, global jihad, Jizya’ etc.

Maybe you don’t believe me. That’s okay. Here are the references.

Remember, it isn’t people like me (or you) labelling them with the same brush. They are.

Just because they’ll say other things to your face, doesn’t mean they are being honest. There is an Islamic tactic of deceit called al-Takia, which is where you lie to the worthless infidels ‘you and I’ until they get close enough to dominate, similar to lying to get into someone’s home so you can rape them.

This is Islam. There is no moderate version, extremist version, happy version, ‘misunderstanders of Islam’ version or any other apologist invention that seeks to separate the openly violent Muslims with the inwardly violent ones.

This will keep happening. I wonder how many instances of Muslims committing crimes ‘in the name of Islam’ will have to occur before these establishment morons admit there is a problem that doesn’t involve ‘stupid English racists, swivel eyed loons and so on…

Advertisements


Revealed: How immigration actually costs Britain money and could cause huge social problems

Source: Daily Mail

(Extract)

If there were to be a British Statue of Liberty, it should be erected at Victoria coach station in London.

For it is here that most of the tired, poor, huddled masses of Eastern Europeans have arrived seeking what Michael Howard once called the ‘British dream’.

The influx of the past ten years has been the largest in Britain’s history, changing the country for ever.

Immigrants now make up a ninth of our population, produce a fifth of our babies and fill (or create) most of our new jobs.

It’s a situation that causes concern across the board. Recently an all-party group of MPs and peers, including Frank Field, made a desperate plea for ‘balanced migration’ — meaning that immigration should be linked to the number of people leaving the country.

They also suggested an annual limit of up to 20,000 non-EU immigrants and published the results of a YouGov poll which suggests that limiting immigration would be a vote-winner for any party.

If all this immigration were the product of deliberate policy, one might indeed expect a British Statue of Liberty to be in the planning stages, as a way of commemorating how Britain, in just a few years, became almost as much of an immigrant country as the vast continent that is the United States (an eighth of its population is immigrant).

Yet the truth is that this social transformation pretty much happened by accident. Not so much a ‘British dream’, as what happened when ministers were asleep.

Nonsense. This was planned, from the Marxists in Parliament to those they illegally sold our soverignty to, the unelected EU. This was always about destroying Britain. Globalisation and pulling down everybody below the political and corporate elite. Continue reading



Is the fluoride in our water really good for our teeth?

I have added some information the article neglects to mention.

Source: Daily Mail

The Government wants 40 per cent of England’s water supply to be fluoridated to reduce high levels of tooth decay. But its critics say it has been linked to conditions such as hypothyrodism (underactive thyroid gland). Here we explain what you should know.

Q: What is fluoride?

A: A naturally occurring mineral found in water and some foods (such as tea and fish). It can also be chemically produced – as in toothpaste. Fluoride strengthens tooth enamel and makes teeth more resistant to acid attacks.

The fluoride they use for fluoridation is not naturally occurring. It is called Hydrofluosilic acid. More information about it can be found below, from No To Fluoridation;

Hydrofluosilic acid (H 2 SiF 6 ) and other fluorosilicates are not naturally occurring. They are waste products derived from the industrial manufacture of aluminium, zinc, uranium, aerosols, insecticides, fertilizers, plastics, lubricants and pharmaceuticals.

Professor Kaj Roholm , former Chief of the Toxicology Committee for the National Research Council the author of the first and most comprehensive monograph on fluorosilicates classifies hydrofluorosilic acid and hexafluorosilic acid as “extremely toxic.” One chemical company selling fluoride to water suppliers describes it as “a colourless to straw yellow, transparent, fuming, corrosive liquid with a pungent odour and irritating action on the skin.”

Hydrofluorosilic acid is listed as a Part II poisons under the Poisons Act 1972. As such its use as a commercially ingestible product in water contravenes UK and EU pharmaceutical legislation governing the regulation of medicinal substances, as well as the Poisons Act.

Continue reading



English is a second language for 1 in 8 pupils in England

Source: Daily Mail

(Extract)

One in eight pupils speaks English as a second language, a report has revealed.

The Government survey highlights the ‘disunited nations’ in classrooms as teachers battle to educate a massive influx of immigrants. In some areas more than 70 per cent of pupils arriving at the school gates do not speak English as their mother tongue.

MPs and unions immediately called on ministers to take urgent action to prevent primaries and secondaries being overwhelmed by the pressure. They warn that schools are being forced to juggle resources as migrant children take longer to understand lessons and divert the teacher’s energies from other pupils.

The figures give the sharpest snapshot yet of the scale of the challenge facing schools around the country.

The Department for Children, Schools and Families statistics showed that 815,450 schoolchildren  –  or 12.5 per cent  –  did not speak English as their mother tongue as of January this year.

For primary schools, the proportion was 14.3 per cent, or one in seven, compared with 10.5 per cent in 2004, the year before European Union expansion.

Meanwhile, in secondary schools 10.6 per cent of pupils, or about 450,000, have English as a second language. Two years ago, the proportion was 9.5 per cent. Continue reading



BBC fat cats get £700,000 in pay rises/ bonuses

Orwell’s Ministry of Truth padding its own pockets with your cash in praise of a propaganda job well done. Sound familiar?

Source: Daily Mail

BBC chiefs have been criticised for pocketing huge pay rises despite a disastrous year for the corporation’s reputation.

Eleven directors who oversaw phone-in scandals and job cuts shared an extra £708,000 between them – increasing the BBC pay bill by an inflation-busting 16 per cent.

But the average salary for ordinary BBC staff went up by only four per cent and is due to increase by just two per cent this year.

Gerry Morrissey, of broadcasting workers’ union Bectu, condemned the bonuses and said the board should have refused them.

‘I would remind them that 4,000 jobs have been lost since 2005,’ he said.

Mr Morrissey added that ordinary staff were working harder than ever because increased output had put a greater burden on fewer employees.

He said the disclosure of such big bonuses for board members made industrial action more likely if further job cuts were unveiled.

Well I’m sure they are doing fine, between the extortionate License Fee and kick-backs from the EU, along with the profits they receive from selling programmes and documentaries they created using License Fee payers hard earned cash (who then have to pay again to get a copy.) No problem, they need to keep their propaganda machinery well oiled, just like the Socialist Police State. Personally, I have never paid the License Fee, even back in the way when I used to watch television. You should not pay it either, for many reasons, like this, this, this and this.



Toddlers who dislike spicy food ‘racist’

Hot on the heels of Schools Being Used For Social Engineering.

Source: Telegraph

Toddlers who turn their noses up at spicy food from overseas could be branded racists by a Government-sponsored agency.

The National Children’s Bureau, which receives £12 million a year, mainly from Government funded organisations, has issued guidance to play leaders and nursery teachers advising them to be alert for racist incidents among youngsters in their care.

This could include a child of as young as three who says “yuk” in response to being served unfamiliar foreign food.

The guidance by the NCB is designed to draw attention to potentially-racist attitudes in youngsters from a young age.

Well at least they are not criminals right?

It alerts playgroup leaders that even babies can not be ignored in the drive to root out prejudice as they can “recognise different people in their lives”.

The 366-page guide for staff in charge of pre-school children, called Young Children and Racial Justice, warns: “Racist incidents among children in early years settings tend to be around name-calling, casual thoughtless comments and peer group relationships.” Continue reading



Another Traitor Calls for Sharia Law in England

Source: Daily Mail

A leading lawyer yesterday called for sharia rules to be written into English law.

Stephen Hockman QC said legal reforms to incorporate Islamic principles are inevitable. He warned that ‘otherwise we will find there is a very significant section of our society which is increasingly alienated, with very dangerous results.’

Oh really? Is he threatened by the Religion of PeaceTM by any chance?

His comments follow the controversial speech this week by Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips, who gave his approval to the use of sharia law for deciding family and marriage disputes and mediating in arguments among Muslims.

In February, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams ran into difficulties after proposing that Islamic law should have a role in Britain.

Mr Hockman said: ‘Given the world situation and our own substantial Muslim population, it is vital that we look at ways to integrate Muslim culture into our own traditions.’

Substantial? Since when was 2.8% of the population substantial?

Why is he not speaking of the substantial 90%+ of the population who are not Muslim? Why is he not speaking of Muslims working to align themselves with British culture? We are in Britain last time I checked. Maybe he has read the Quran and knows that Islam views all other religions and cultures as inferior. Or maybe he is just under the command of the Euro-mediterranean Project and its goals to flood Western countries with Islam under the guise of ‘cultural integration’. Either way, how about a rewrite of the last line. I suggest the following;

‘Given the world situation and our own Muslim population, it is vital that Muslims immediately look at ways to accept British culture and Law into our own traditions or find themselves deported to an Islamic State.’