Free Britain


True Islam broadcast on British TV

The communications watchdog, Ofcom, has made a series of rulings against channels which allowed “inflammatory” material to be broadcast in breach of rules which forbid extreme opinions gaining a platform on British television.

The cases, disclosed today, include examples of an imam telling viewers that those who disrespect the prophet Mohammed should be killed, and another broadcaster saying homosexuals should be beaten and tortured.

Please note, these statements of ‘hate’ as the establishment try to paint it, are part of Islamic teachings. It is not a ‘misunderstanding of Islam’. Another command in Islam is that anyone who leaves the knuckle dragging death cult must be murdered.

You can’t leave you see. Because Islam is so peaceful you see.

Tala Rajab, the researcher who wrote the report for Quilliam, the anti-extremist think-tank, said the fresh findings by Ofcom raised serious questions over the regulation of broadcast material.

“Some of these recent incidents have been quite shocking,” he said.

“If this had happened in a mosque the police would be right in pursuing a criminal investigation. But because they are being broadcast on television channels for some reason there seems to be little appetite for looking into these extreme messages.

“If these kind of comments were made against black people, for example, you can imagine a channel being shut down overnight, particularly if they had incited violence against a minority.”

So Ofcom, the State, the Police turn a blind eye because they’re Muslims. (Although I thought inciting the murder of people is the cardinal violation of free speech). Just like they turned a blind eye to the gang raping / drugging of white girls by Pakistani Muslims, which is okay under Islam by the way.

Islam is the most despicable  ideology I’ve ever studied, and I’ve probably studied them all. But to blame Islam itself is wrong. Islam is just a collection of books and pages. MUSLIMS are the issue because they identify themselves with this creed. They are telling you ‘yes I agree with the paedophilia, the rape, murder, conquest, violence, global jihad, Jizya’ etc.

Maybe you don’t believe me. That’s okay. Here are the references.

Remember, it isn’t people like me (or you) labelling them with the same brush. They are.

Just because they’ll say other things to your face, doesn’t mean they are being honest. There is an Islamic tactic of deceit called al-Takia, which is where you lie to the worthless infidels ‘you and I’ until they get close enough to dominate, similar to lying to get into someone’s home so you can rape them.

This is Islam. There is no moderate version, extremist version, happy version, ‘misunderstanders of Islam’ version or any other apologist invention that seeks to separate the openly violent Muslims with the inwardly violent ones.

This will keep happening. I wonder how many instances of Muslims committing crimes ‘in the name of Islam’ will have to occur before these establishment morons admit there is a problem that doesn’t involve ‘stupid English racists, swivel eyed loons and so on…



Regents Park mosque found still preaching hate against Britain

I guess it is another one of those endless ‘isolated incidents’ all done by the followers of the same religion/ fascist ideology.

From the Daily Mail;

The Saudi Arabian preachers were secretly filmed ordering women to murder gays and ex-Muslims.

Undercover reporters from Channel 4’s Dispatches recorded the lectures in the women’s section of Regent’s Park Mosque in London.

An unnamed Saudi woman is seen mocking other religions – labelling Christianity ‘vile’ and an ‘abomination’. Another, known as ‘Angelique’, claims Britain is a ‘land of evil’.

Christians are disbelievers for believing in the divinity of Christ. 5:17
Have no unbelieving friends. Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them. 4:89
‘Only Muslims are Innocent’ says Muslim on BBC
– Video

The investigators attended lectures for two months at the mosque, which had promised a clean-up after another Dispatches probe just 18 months ago exposed it for spreading extreme Islamic views.

What does ‘extreme’ views mean anyway? Why would a religion of peace(tm) have ‘extreme’ views? These commands are all written in the Koran and last time I checked, they were not under a specific chapter or Sura called ‘Extreme Views’. If it has such views then it obviously is not a religion of peace. Which it isn’t.

During one sermon, a woman called Um Amira says: ‘He is Muslim, and he gets out of Islam…what are we going to do? We kill him, kill, kill.’ Continue reading



Personal data of a million bank customers found on computer sold on eBay for £35

This just never seems to let up…

Source: Daily Mail

(Extract)

Personal details of more than a million bank customers have been found on a computer sold on eBay.

Highly sensitive information on American Express, NatWest and Royal Bank of Scotland customers was stored on the machine’s hard drive.

It includes names, addresses, mobile phone numbers, bank account numbers, sort codes, credit card numbers, mothers’ maiden names and even signatures.

It was described as ‘a data thief’s treasure chest’, with everything a criminal needs to assume a customer’s identity – and clear out their bank account.

The massive data loss – one of the worst ever in Britain – is a clear breach of the banks’ obligation under the Data Protection Act to keep all personal information secure.

Coming just days after the Home Office admitted losing the details of 127,000 criminals, it is certain to fuel public concern about how Government and businesses look after our secrets.

Last night it was revealed that a second computer from the same site has gone missing, meaning yet more information could have been leaked.

IT security expert Adam Laurie said: ‘This is appalling. This information is worth millions – a thief could easily use it to go on an enormous shopping spree.’

Liberal Democrat spokesman Tom Brake said: ‘This is yet another example of a seemingly trusted organisation appearing to be sloppy with people’s personal information. Continue reading



Is the fluoride in our water really good for our teeth?

I have added some information the article neglects to mention.

Source: Daily Mail

The Government wants 40 per cent of England’s water supply to be fluoridated to reduce high levels of tooth decay. But its critics say it has been linked to conditions such as hypothyrodism (underactive thyroid gland). Here we explain what you should know.

Q: What is fluoride?

A: A naturally occurring mineral found in water and some foods (such as tea and fish). It can also be chemically produced – as in toothpaste. Fluoride strengthens tooth enamel and makes teeth more resistant to acid attacks.

The fluoride they use for fluoridation is not naturally occurring. It is called Hydrofluosilic acid. More information about it can be found below, from No To Fluoridation;

Hydrofluosilic acid (H 2 SiF 6 ) and other fluorosilicates are not naturally occurring. They are waste products derived from the industrial manufacture of aluminium, zinc, uranium, aerosols, insecticides, fertilizers, plastics, lubricants and pharmaceuticals.

Professor Kaj Roholm , former Chief of the Toxicology Committee for the National Research Council the author of the first and most comprehensive monograph on fluorosilicates classifies hydrofluorosilic acid and hexafluorosilic acid as “extremely toxic.” One chemical company selling fluoride to water suppliers describes it as “a colourless to straw yellow, transparent, fuming, corrosive liquid with a pungent odour and irritating action on the skin.”

Hydrofluorosilic acid is listed as a Part II poisons under the Poisons Act 1972. As such its use as a commercially ingestible product in water contravenes UK and EU pharmaceutical legislation governing the regulation of medicinal substances, as well as the Poisons Act.

Continue reading



One third of whites claim they are victims of racism in Britain

What would ever give them such ideas?

Source: Daily Mail

A growing number of white people believe they are the victims of racial prejudice in Britain, official research has found.

Almost one in three – 29 per cent – said they now expected to be treated worse than other races by key public services.

And the number of whites claiming to have been refused a job or discriminated against at work for reasons of race has doubled in the last five years, according to the Government study.

Seven per cent believed they had failed to win a promotion because of their race, up from three per cent in 2003.

Three per cent alleged they had been turned down for a job for the same reason, up from one per cent.

In addition, the study reveals that most ethnic minorities living in Britain feel stronger ties to the nation than whites.

One in six white Britons feel only a slight sense of belonging to the nation.

Whites also now feel less able than other ethnic groups to influence decisions affecting their local area and the country as a whole.

For example, 41 per cent of black African, 36 per cent of Bangladeshi and 35 per cent of Indian people feel they have a say in decisions affecting Britain, compared to 19 per cent of white people.

The survey of 15,000 people – ordered by Communities Secretary Hazel Blears – is likely to prompt a fierce debate about the disillusionment of the white majority. Continue reading



Richard Dawkins blames Muslims for ‘importing creationism’ into classrooms

Political correctness is a Marxist tool designed for speech (and as a consequence, thought) control. It is also known as collectivist protectionism. It simply stops people criticising or highlighting issues with a particular group or groups, giving them higher social status and power than other groups that are not protected. The State can then use this to play groups off of each other, and using every negative consequence to expand the power of the State.

Source: Daily Mail

Britain’s most famous atheist has blamed devout Muslims for importing creationist theories into the country’s science classes.

Professor Richard Dawkins, who wrote the bestselling book The God Delusion, believes that children should be taught the theory of evolution instead of the idea that God created the universe.

Dawkins, who holds the chair for the understanding of science at Oxford, thinks that political correctness has made it impossible for teachers to criticise Islam because they will be branded as being racist.

‘The government could do more but it doesn’t want to because it is fanatical about multiculturalism and the need to respect the different traditions from which these children come.

‘The government – particularly under Tony Blair – thinks it is wonderful to have children brought up with their traditional religions. I call it brainwashing.

‘It’s almost impossible to say anything against Islam in this country because if you do you are accused of being racist or Islamophobic.’

He added: ‘It is fine to teach children about scientific controversies.

‘What is not fine is to say: “There are these two theories. One is called evolution, the other is called Genesis.”

‘If you are going to say that, then you should talk about the Nigerian tribe who believe the world was created from the excrements of ants.

‘Because we are all brought up to respect faith, it leaves open a gap through which fanatics can charge.’



Ireland now EVEN MORE strongly opposed to Lisbon revote

Oh man I love the Irish, if not for the gorgeous girls, great artists, beautiful people and country, and great booze, then for not taking any crap from that socialist twit, Sarkozy and his Soviet dictatorship of an EU. They definitely smell a rat.

Source: EU Observer

Almost three quarters of Irish voters are opposed to the idea of a second vote on the EU’s Lisbon treaty, according to a fresh poll.

The survey, revealed on Sunday (27 July), was commissioned by the London-based eurosceptic think-tank Open Europe, and carried out among 1,000 respondents between 21 and 23 July, shortly after a visit by French president Nicolas Sarkozy in Dublin.

The leader of France, which currently hold the EU’s six-month rotating presidency, last week proposed to the Irish prime minister, Brian Cowen, that a second referendum on the Lisbon Treaty be held on the same day as elections to the European Parliament next June.

But the new poll signals that there is currently not much appetite among Irish voters to be asked about the same document again: 71 percent of respondents said they were against the move, compared to 24 percent who were in favour.

The survey also suggested that in the case of a repeated referendum, even more people would vote No than the first time around: 62 percent of those polled now said they would reject the treaty while just 38 percent would vote Yes. Continue reading



Selling land by the acre to be banned under new EU ruling

Another regulation from the unelected EU rolls over our Sovereignty…

Source: Daily Mail

People in Britain will lose the right to sell land in acres under a new Brussels ruling nodded through by the Government.

In a low-key meeting, a junior minister agreed last week to abolish the ancient imperial measurement and replace it with the metric equivalent ‘hectare’ from 2010.

The UK previously had an opt-out, technically known as a ‘derogation’, from the EU’s use of some metric measurements, which allowed the continued use of acres for the pruposes of land registration.

But from January 1, 2010, the unit, which dates back to the 13th century, will be banned.

The decision was buried deep within the small print of EU directive 80/181/EEC on agriculture and fisheries and revealed by the Tories.

‘This is this kind of pointless interference into the nooks and crannies of our national life that frustrates people about the EU,’ said shadow Europe minister Mark Francois.

‘Whether we use hectares or acres should be a matter for Britain to decide, not the EU.

‘Once again this weak Labour Government has meekly given up yet another of Britain’s rights to Brussels.

‘They need to think again and insist that we must keep our right to use our ancient traditional measure of land if we wish.’

Successive British governments have been under pressure from Brussels to announce a date for phasing out imperial measures altogether, with the latest deadline set for 2009.

Last year, however, the European Commission and Parliament announced that it would no longer be seeking their extinction.

It followed campaigns by Britons dubbed ‘Metric Martyrs’ who have fought for years to stop the march of new measurements from Europe. Continue reading



London Councils Must Enforce EU Regulations on British People

Another example of one of the 107,000+ regulations created by the unelected, unaccountable suits in Brussels being pushed on on the British people. The EU Treaties give Brussels superiority over Westminster, giving our government no choice but to enforce the diktat of Brussels on the British people.

Source: Daily Mail

It is the nation’s favourite Chinese dish – adored by millions and a staple feature on the menus of restaurants and takeaways the length and breadth of Britain.

But Peking Duck could now be forced into extinction by an EU ban on the ovens traditionally used to prepare it.

Council inspectors have been busily visiting restaurants that use the ovens and sealing them closed with tape because they do not carry a CE (Conformité Européenne) mark certifying that the equipment meets safety standards on carbon-monoxide emissions laid down by Brussels.

The clampdown comes despite an admission by council officials that there have been no reported health problems linked to the ovens, which are made in China and are also used to cook Cantonese Duck and suckling pig.

The ban has infuriated celebrity chef Ken Hom, who said last night: ‘It’s absurd. What do the Europeans know about making Chinese duck? It’s just as outrageous as people in Hong Kong being told they can’t make fish and chips. I am livid.’

Westminster has now contacted other councils in areas with large Chinese populations to raise the issue.

A council spokesman said: ‘If the restaurants want to continue cooking ducks in the traditional manner they will need to get new ovens which will comply with EU standards by having CE marking. Continue reading



Is signing the Lisbon Treaty Treason?

Regarding the Lisbon Treaty and an apparent conflict with our superior Bill of Rights.



Dictator Sarkozy Tells Ireland That Voting No Is Unacceptable

Saying ‘no’ is not good enough for the pompous prick and his band of merry Marxists. Can’t let the People and their wishes come between Brussels and total Communist Dictatorship  (sorry, harmonised Europe) now, can we?

Source: EU Observer

(Extract)

French President Nicolas Sarkozy has said that Ireland will have to vote once more on the EU treaty, in a move bound to ruffle feathers in Dublin, which has yet to say publicly how it plans to react to last month’s treaty rejection.

According to a report in the Irish Times, Mr Sarkozy told a meeting of deputies from his UMP party in Paris on Tuesday (15 July): “The Irish will have to vote again.”

Reacting to the comments – which were downplayed but not denied by the French government – Irish foreign minister Micheal Martin said that Mr Sarkozy will listen but not “impose a solution” during the planned five-hour talks next week.

He stressed that Ireland would take its own decision on the matter but it was too early to speculate on what this would be, reports state broadcaster RTE.

Now now, own decision? Like the decision the People of Ireland have already made? I think we know what the Fascists in Brussels think of dissenting decisions.

Adding to his discomfort, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso told the Italian parliament on Tuesday:”There has only been one No to the ratification of the treaty, and I do not expect any more.”

Bloomberg reports him as saying that Polish President Lech Kaczynski had told him his country would not block treaty ratification. Mr Barroso also said the Czech Republic would not pose a problem.

Meanwhile, an article in French daily Le Monde on Tuesday suggests that as a sop to Ireland, all member states in the future will continue to have a permanent EU commissioner – instead of the reduced commission planned under the Lisbon Treaty.

This, as well as reassurances that abortion, taxation and neutrality issues will not be affected could be debated as part of an Ireland package at the October summit and adopted by EU leaders in December paving the way for a possible second Irish vote next year. Continue reading



Mediterranean Union Made Public – 13 Years Later

Source: EU Observer

EUOBSERVER / PARIS – France officially announced the launch of the Union for the Mediterranean on Sunday (13 July) – the brainchild of its president Nicolas Sarkozy, who did not hide his pride in seeing the project’s official birth. The project – under its official name Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean – regroups 43 states, including all EU members, and will be co-presided over by one EU and one Mediterranean country – currently Egypt’s president, Hosni Mubarak, and Mr Sarkozy himself.

However, criticism has already been raised about some controversial issues – such as immigration – being left out of the Union’s scope at this stage.

That is because while the media spotlight is on the ‘Union’, they would rather not talk about it. If it has anything in common with the same process started in 1995, then it revolves around increasing mass immigration from these Muslim countries to the democratic West, in the name of ‘cultural exchange’ while at the same time telling everyone else what we can and cannot think;

Cultural policies need to avoid schematic concepts such as the popular distinction between “Us” and “Them”. They even warn against further using the term of “The Other” which is standard in almost all intercultural education concepts, since it opens the gate for imposing collective identities on the individual. There is no viable alternative to their proposal of adopting a rights-based approach in dealing with cultural diversity – Dialogue To Hospitality, Traugott Schoefthaler, Anna Lindh Foundation.

As an aside, take note of the desired re-engineering of the population away from cultural identity in this document with the current actions of our own Government, recently;

It (the National Children’s Bureau) advises nursery teachers to be on the alert for childish abuse such as: “blackie”, “Pakis”, “those people” or “they smell”. – Toddlers who dislike spicy food ‘racist’

The leaders unanimously adopted a declaration deciding to work on six “concrete projects” as initial activities, Mr Sarkozy said. Continue reading



Is Britain becoming a dictatorship?

Source: The Guardian

(Extract)

An 82-year-old former bomber pilot I met in the street the other day said: “Supermen. Ha! If Hitler had come over here we would have given him a proper kick up the jackside.” As Michael White suggests, British people are fond of the myth that they won’t tolerate dictatorships, despite the fact that there were many fascist sympathisers in Britain in the 1930s.

Yes, we do live in a relatively free and secular country – just ask any young Afghani woman studying at a college here for her opinion. But there is also evidence around us that the British government is engaging in repression. And not just in Iraq or Afghanistan, but here in Britain. Perhaps those of us who have lived for a time under dictatorships can spot some of the warning signs:

• Inconvenient elections are avoided in the name of getting on with the job.
• Leaders of the opposition are character-assassinated by the state media.
• Institutions like the legislature begin to lose their independence and traditional role.
• Citizens are increasingly afraid to speak openly on certain issues.
• Citizens are observed and monitored on cameras and the government can tap into their conversations at will.
• Governments can snatch anyone from their homes or off the street and detain them without trial on charges of treason or terrorism.
• Ethnic and religious minorities are persecuted and are made into scapegoats.
• The state increasingly intervenes in family and community life in an attempt to control citizens’ behaviour.
• The focus of discussion moves away from the issues and into a narrative of political rivalries and gossip spreads.
• Governments use bread and circuses to shut people up and distract attention away from their increasing political impotence.
• Public spaces for demonstrations are closed down and restricted.
• Large and ridiculous monuments are built to impress the citizens.
• Individuals have to carry ID with them at all times and the government holds large amounts of information on every citizen. Continue reading



BBC TV licence fee collectors under investigation

Good timing for this article, considering the previous one and my comments about the BBC.

Source: Daily Mail

(Extract)

The BBC is to hold an inquiry into the ‘heavy-handed’ tactics used to collect the licence fee.

Stung by accusations that bully-boy measures are often employed on innocent people, the BBC Trust will investigate whether procedures are ‘appropriate and proportionate’.

TV Licensing, the body which over-sees the collection of the fee, has been accused of a ‘Big Brother’ approach.

One recent advert – with a soundtrack of helicopter blades, barking dogs, a siren and a knock at the door – warns: ‘Your town, your street, your home. . . it is all in our database.’

The database contains 29.5million home, business and student addresses, and is supposed to show who has a licence and who does not.

It added: ‘We have begun a review to ensure the right balance is being struck between the need to raise maximum revenue and the need to avoid heavy-handedness, especially with people that do not own a television set and therefore do not need a licence.’

This always intrigued me. The mere possession of a television would empower the BBC to force you to pay them, whether you watched the BBC or not.

Charles Moore, who has been campaigning against the tactics of TV Licensing in his column in The Spectator, said he had been contacted by a Hamspshire resident who had received 78 letters from it since 2000. Continue reading



BBC fat cats get £700,000 in pay rises/ bonuses

Orwell’s Ministry of Truth padding its own pockets with your cash in praise of a propaganda job well done. Sound familiar?

Source: Daily Mail

BBC chiefs have been criticised for pocketing huge pay rises despite a disastrous year for the corporation’s reputation.

Eleven directors who oversaw phone-in scandals and job cuts shared an extra £708,000 between them – increasing the BBC pay bill by an inflation-busting 16 per cent.

But the average salary for ordinary BBC staff went up by only four per cent and is due to increase by just two per cent this year.

Gerry Morrissey, of broadcasting workers’ union Bectu, condemned the bonuses and said the board should have refused them.

‘I would remind them that 4,000 jobs have been lost since 2005,’ he said.

Mr Morrissey added that ordinary staff were working harder than ever because increased output had put a greater burden on fewer employees.

He said the disclosure of such big bonuses for board members made industrial action more likely if further job cuts were unveiled.

Well I’m sure they are doing fine, between the extortionate License Fee and kick-backs from the EU, along with the profits they receive from selling programmes and documentaries they created using License Fee payers hard earned cash (who then have to pay again to get a copy.) No problem, they need to keep their propaganda machinery well oiled, just like the Socialist Police State. Personally, I have never paid the License Fee, even back in the way when I used to watch television. You should not pay it either, for many reasons, like this, this, this and this.



Toddlers who dislike spicy food ‘racist’

Hot on the heels of Schools Being Used For Social Engineering.

Source: Telegraph

Toddlers who turn their noses up at spicy food from overseas could be branded racists by a Government-sponsored agency.

The National Children’s Bureau, which receives £12 million a year, mainly from Government funded organisations, has issued guidance to play leaders and nursery teachers advising them to be alert for racist incidents among youngsters in their care.

This could include a child of as young as three who says “yuk” in response to being served unfamiliar foreign food.

The guidance by the NCB is designed to draw attention to potentially-racist attitudes in youngsters from a young age.

Well at least they are not criminals right?

It alerts playgroup leaders that even babies can not be ignored in the drive to root out prejudice as they can “recognise different people in their lives”.

The 366-page guide for staff in charge of pre-school children, called Young Children and Racial Justice, warns: “Racist incidents among children in early years settings tend to be around name-calling, casual thoughtless comments and peer group relationships.” Continue reading



Man Stops Youth Robbing Store, Gets Arrested, Youth Let Off

You couldn’t make this up.

Source: Daily Mail

A businessman was stunned when he detained a yob for smashing a shop window only to be charged by police with assault.

Steve Kink apprehended a thug after catching him breaking into a mobile phone shop late at night.

Although the 47-year-old was punched in the face, he managed to pin the offender to the floor.

Passers-by called the police while he stood over him until officers arrested the 25-year-old man.

Mr Kink, who owns a tattoo parlour, was stunned when he found out the next day the suspect had been let off with a caution for criminal damage.

But his shock turned to fury when days later police officers turned up at his house to arrest him for assaulting the thug.

He was taken to his local police station and held in a cell for six hours before being interviewed.

He was then charged with assault and battery and is due to appear before magistrates next week.

The Government does not share power. It wants to centralise all responsibility and power under the umbrella of the State. No independent thoughts or actions of the People allowed. This is also a perfect example of the Socialist State working hard to undermine the authority of adults, something that inevitably leads to the tribalism and social breakdown we are seeing today. Maybe the Government is hoping that these brats will be able to scare the People into relinquishing even more power and Individual Rights to the State.



UK Government committing Treason In A Few Paragraphs

This can be proven with the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Lisbon Treaty, although the same can be said for the previous European Union Treaties.

Firstly, not only is the Bill of Rights 1689 still in force, it, by definition, cannot be removed, changed or signed away by anyone. Least of all Parliament, further details can be found here.

This section of the Bill of Rights is taken from www.statutelaw.gov.uk. It states the following;

And I doe declare That noe Forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall within this Realme Soe helpe me God.

In other words, we may not be ruled in any way, shape or form by any foreign entity.

Now to the Lisbon Treaty/ Constitution. Firstly;

The analysis finds that only 10 out of 250 proposals in the new treaty are different from the proposals in the original EU Constitution. In other words, 96% of the text is the same as the rejected Constitution. – Open Europe.

Within the Lisbon Treaty is Declaration 17 concerning Primacy. Download it here. (Pg 26)

The Conference recalls that, in accordance with well settled case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Treaties and the law adopted by the Union on the basis of the Treaties have primacy over the law of Member States, under the conditions laid down by the said case law.

So the European Union has supremacy over British Law. This is illegal. Not only that, but at this moment;

80 per cent of Britain’s laws are now made in Brussels and Parliament has no power to reject or amend them – Peter Lilley.

More information below. Continue reading



Another Traitor Calls for Sharia Law in England

Source: Daily Mail

A leading lawyer yesterday called for sharia rules to be written into English law.

Stephen Hockman QC said legal reforms to incorporate Islamic principles are inevitable. He warned that ‘otherwise we will find there is a very significant section of our society which is increasingly alienated, with very dangerous results.’

Oh really? Is he threatened by the Religion of PeaceTM by any chance?

His comments follow the controversial speech this week by Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips, who gave his approval to the use of sharia law for deciding family and marriage disputes and mediating in arguments among Muslims.

In February, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams ran into difficulties after proposing that Islamic law should have a role in Britain.

Mr Hockman said: ‘Given the world situation and our own substantial Muslim population, it is vital that we look at ways to integrate Muslim culture into our own traditions.’

Substantial? Since when was 2.8% of the population substantial?

Why is he not speaking of the substantial 90%+ of the population who are not Muslim? Why is he not speaking of Muslims working to align themselves with British culture? We are in Britain last time I checked. Maybe he has read the Quran and knows that Islam views all other religions and cultures as inferior. Or maybe he is just under the command of the Euro-mediterranean Project and its goals to flood Western countries with Islam under the guise of ‘cultural integration’. Either way, how about a rewrite of the last line. I suggest the following;

‘Given the world situation and our own Muslim population, it is vital that Muslims immediately look at ways to accept British culture and Law into our own traditions or find themselves deported to an Islamic State.’



UK’s Top Judge Calls For Use Of Islamic Law

Source: Daily Mail

The most senior judge in England yesterday gave his blessing to the use of sharia law to resolve disputes among Muslims.

Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips said that Islamic legal principles could be employed to deal with family and marital arguments and to regulate finance.

Traitors are in our midst.

He declared: ‘Those entering into a contractual agreement can agree that the agreement shall be governed by a law other than English law.’

In his speech at an East London mosque, Lord Phillips signalled approval of sharia principles as long as punishments – and divorce rulings – complied with the law of the land.

But his remarks, which back the informal sharia courts operated by numerous mosques, provoked a barrage of criticism.

Barrister and human rights specialist John Cooper said: ‘There should be one law by which everyone is held to account.

‘Well-crafted laws in this country, drawn up to protect both parties including the weak and vulnerable party in matrimonial break-ups, could be compromised.’

Resolution, the organisation of family law solicitors, said people should govern their lives in accordance with religious principles ‘provided that those beliefs and traditions do not contradict the fundamental principle of equality on which Britain’s laws are based.’

UK Law is supposed to be the highest law of the land. Any which contradicts it is illegal. These statements from Judges just serves to divide the country and reveals their contempt for British Sovereignty. Either respect the laws of the land or be ejected from the country.

The article seems to focus on the issue of discrimination against women as the main reason for protesting against this. That is not the main issue. The issue is trying to get Sharia Law implemented in a foreign nation. Conquest by stealth.

Islam views its laws and dictates as superior to all others. Muslims view Islamic Law as superior to British Law and Islamic life/ culture as superior to all others. The Quran commands Muslims to live by these Laws. These Laws are incompatible with the Magna Carta, Bill of Rights and Common Laws. It commands Muslims to go out in the world and spread Islam until the entire human civilisation is under the House of Allah. I will present an article on Islam shortly.



The European Union Story

This article was found at the source below but I believe it originated elsewhere (possibly the old EU Truth site?) I have re-posted it here to clear up formatting issues and other typos. It will also be a work-in-progress in the sense I will be providing external links to provide additional information and evidence supporting the statements made in this article – FM Watkins.

Source: EU Dictatorship / Unknown

Sections: The EU Dictatorship Exposed | The Take-Over of Britain | Your Citizenship | Regionalisation | EU Democracy? | Qualified Majority Voting | Immunity from Prosecution | Funding of Political Parties | Human Rights | Why Britain Does Not Belong To Europe | The Terminal Power-Play for Britain | So Why is it Happening? | Britain – an Economic Threat to the Continent | Facts | Selling Britain By The Pound | Smoke and Mirrors | No Turning Back | Where the Rubber Meets the Road | Tax Increases for all, Especially Britain | The British Support the Euro? | Enlarging the Union | Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) | Britain – A Sterling Place to do Business | Brussels Moves the Goal Posts … Again | Conversion to the New Currency | Corruption and Fraud | Above the Law | Drawn and Quartered | Justice for All | EU Justice – No Checks and Balances

The EU Dictatorship Exposed

In the words of Winston Churchill and in reference to Stanley Baldwin who was Prime Minister at the time (exporting Rolls Royce aero engines to Germany) prior to the outbreak of World War II he spoke the following words:

“Whose in charge of the clattering train? The axle’s creak and the couplings strain; the pace is hot and the points are near and sleep has deadened the driver’s ear and the signals flash through the night in vain for death is in charge of the clattering train”

The Take-Over of Britain

On 1st January 1973, Conservative British Prime Minister Edward Heath took Britain into the European Common Market. Heath reassured Parliament and the British people at the time that British sovereignty would not be affected and that we were just joining a trading partnership. His 1971 government White Paper stated the following:

“There is no question of Britain losing essential national sovereignty… The British safeguards of habeus corpus and trial by jury will remain intact. So will the principle that a man is innocent until he has been proved guilty.”

Subsequent papers came to light, which unequivocally show that Edward Heath recognised that he had known all along that Britain was signing up to a federal Europe. Continue reading